Accessibility Tools

Skip to main content

OPINION: The PREP Act, COVID-19 Vaccines, and the Challenge to Constitutional Rights

In the unprecedented global health crisis brought about by COVID-19, vaccines have been a beacon of hope, offering a pathway out of the pandemic. However, the legal framework surrounding vaccine injury compensation in the United States, particularly in the context of COVID-19 vaccines, has sparked significant debate and concern regarding the access to justice and constitutional rights. The PREP Act&'s role in this scenario and its implications for those seeking compensation for vaccine injuries illuminate a complex intersection of public health policy and individual rights.

Understanding the PREP Act and Its Impact

The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, enacted in 2005, grants broad immunity to companies producing or distributing critical medical supplies, such as vaccines, against legal claims related to their use during a public health emergency. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a declaration under the PREP Act, providing liability immunity to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and administrators, effectively precluding individuals who experience adverse reactions from pursuing claims through traditional legal channels or the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).

As a result, those injured by COVID-19 vaccines have been directed to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), a mechanism that has been criticized for its lack of transparency, accessibility, and perceived fairness. With over 9,000 claims filed, the CICP has reportedly rejected approximately 97% of them, compensating only 11 individuals at an average payout of $3,700—a sum that many argue is insufficient to cover the long-term health and financial impacts of serious vaccine injuries.

The 5th and 7th Amendments: A Closer Look at the Rights at Stake

The challenges faced by those seeking compensation through the CICP raise important questions about the protection of constitutional rights, specifically those guaranteed by the 5th and 7th Amendments. The 5th Amendment guarantees due process of law, ensuring that the government cannot deprive individuals of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This fundamental principle supports the right to a fair and just legal process, including in matters of compensation for harm or injury.

The 7th Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial in civil cases where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars, underscoring the importance of having disputes adjudicated by a jury of one&'s peers—a cornerstone of the American legal system. This right is especially relevant in the context of vaccine injury claims, where individuals may seek to have their grievances heard and adjudicated in a court of law.

The Path Forward: Seeking Balance and Justice

The reliance on the CICP for COVID-19 vaccine injuries, under the umbrella of the PREP Act, has spotlighted the tension between the need for rapid vaccine development and distribution during a public health emergency and the fundamental rights of individuals who suffer adverse reactions. As the pandemic evolves, there is a growing call for policy reforms that better balance these interests, ensuring that vaccine manufacturers are incentivized to prioritize safety while also providing robust, fair, and accessible compensation mechanisms for those rare but significant instances of vaccine injury.

Critics argue for amendments to the PREP Act or alternative legislative measures that would allow COVID-19 vaccine injury claims to be processed through the NVICP, offering claimants a more transparent and just path to compensation. Such reforms would not only potentially provide more generous compensation but also ensure adherence to the constitutional guarantees of due process and the right to a jury trial.


As the nation continues to navigate the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, the debate over vaccine injury compensation remains a pivotal issue at the intersection of public health and individual rights. Ensuring access to fair and equitable compensation, while upholding the constitutional protections guaranteed by the 5th and 7th Amendments, is critical to maintaining public trust in the vaccination efforts and the broader health system. Policymakers are urged to reconsider the current framework, seeking solutions that honor the principles of justice and equity at the heart of American democracy.



  • Published:

    21 March 2024
  • Category: